Season 2, Episode 11: "Rough Justice" Essay
Excess and Equilibrium
This episode provides a warning against excess. Various characters
over-indulge themselves, their emotions, their hungers and fears. A few do the
opposite, demonstrating carelessness and a lack of care or fear. And in the
midst of it all, one character, for reasons which turn mainstream society's
morality on its ear, strikes the perfect balance.
The excessive consumption of two characters is emphasized most explicitly,
setting the stage for a framework to understand every other character's
behavior. Renee Williams eats and drinks as much as she can. She gulps orange
juice and wolfs down lunch. This ability to consume is very important to her.
When Fenner confronts her about her racist behavior, his words have no impact
until he starts discarding her shampoo and hair spray, denying her the right to
consume it. Fenner understands that this is the way to undermine Renee, because
he's as dependent on consumption as she is. He spends this entire episode
getting as drunk as possible as often as possible. In a scene later in the
episode, when Sylvia joins him at the pub to confess her security lapse with
Denny and Shaz, it's Sylvia who says she's "had enough" after her one
(non-alcoholic) drink. In contrast, Fenner can't tell when he's had enough.
This overindulgence is a very dangerous behavior for both Renee and Fenner. A
person can only stomach so much. Fenner's drinking is putting him at risk of
losing his job. His repeated displays of incompetence while drunk would be
enough to get any other officer fired or at least suspended or demoted. Renee,
having antagonized nearly every single one of her fellow inmates, has put
herself at particular risk. Can she stomach moldy bread? Rat poison? Peanuts?
The danger of both characters' over-consumption is emphasized by the
cross-editing of Fenner gorging himself on alcohol at the very moment that Renee
is gorging herself on allergic-reaction-inducing peanut sprinkles.
Nikki falls into a similar trap of excess, but not an excess of eating or
drinking: an excess of reading meaning where there is none. She spots Dominic
and Helen talking in the courtyard, and sees Helen touch his arm. She takes too
much from Claire's off-handed comment about Nikki's friendship with Trish: "It's
nice when you can still be friends, eh?" drawing the tentative, perhaps barely
conscious conclusion that Claire and Helen were once involved, and now fall into
the same "still friends" category of she and Trish.
She overhears Di egging on Dominic about his pint-and-curry with
Helen. Of course, with her excessive observations, she's drawing the completely
wrong conclusion, which Helen reminds her after she asks about Helen's history
with Claire: "I've never been into women" she assures Nikki, with almost a wink,
and then tells her she has no reason to be jealous.
It's not like Nikki to get so carried away in her reading of Helen and others
around her. In fact, Nikki usually reads Helen consistently and accurately. In
the episode's opening sequence Helen finds Nikki in the potting shed, just
barely ducking down to peek in the window as she walks by. Nikki reads her
unspoken signal and comes out to talk. In the Lifer's meeting, Nikki's
smoldering stare when Helen refers to the prisoners' "offending behavior" causes
Helen to swoon for a moment, totally losing track of herself. Nikki's tiny grin
shows how clearly she sees the palpable effect she has on Helen.
While Nikki is overreacting, Shaz spends this episode in a disturbing state of
under-reaction. She doesn't seem to be capable of acknowledging the seriousness
of her crimes, nor the seriousness of Renee's death. Yvonne tries to warn Denny,
and by extension Shaz, of the risk to Shaz if Renee's death gets pinned on her,
telling Denny "Poisoning people, that's mad stuff." Poisoning people is bad:
poisoning someone after you've just been thrown in jail for poisoning three
other people is criminally insane.
The police investigation offers another under-reactive counterpoint, an example
of examining too little, rather than too much. Once they find out that an
allergic reaction caused Renee's death, they take the information at face value,
acknowledging it could still have been murder, but it will be "impossible to
prove"—which is another way of saying, we don't have the ability to read this
evidence, or the care or motivation to try. But even before the cause of death
was determined, they spend the episode misdirected, looking in the wrong place (Shaz
with the mold in the cell, rather than Yvonne with the peanuts in the servery),
and never even conduct an interview with the actual murderer.
That murderer, Yvonne, is the best detective in this episode, the character who
finds the perfect balance between close observation and avoiding excess. She
observes Renee in the food line rejecting a dish with nuts in it, goes to the
library to do some research, and voila, she's figured out a way to bring Renee
down without getting caught. Yvonne embodies the effective equilibrium between
the lack of interest on the part of the police, and the excessive interest which
Nikki demonstrates. Most notably, we, the audience, don't consider Yvonne's
action to be excessive. This is fundamentally strange, given that she commits
what is generally considered to be one of the most heinous of crimes. But given
the danger Renee poses to her, and the lack of options available for protecting
herself, Yvonne's decision to kill Renee actually feels quite measured and
reasonable, with just a stroke of genius.
If murder can be considered reasonable and laudable behavior, then what makes
some other excesses problematic? It's Nikki's astute ability to read people that
makes her vulnerable to the jealous paranoia, just as Renee's gluttony makes her
vulnerable to poisoning. If you're someone who has the tendency to be jealous,
perhaps it's best to keep your eyes closed as much as possible, so as to avoid
seeing anything to stimulate jealousy. Similarly, if you're someone who's
allergic to peanuts, perhaps it's best to be extremely careful about what you
put in your mouth. Too much of a good thing is very dangerous.
But there's a notable distinction between Renee and Nikki's excesses. Renee is
depicted as driven by some pathology, a sense of entitlement that drives her to
claim as much territory as possible (akin to the first lion in the pack to get
the food). Nikki, on the other hand, is more like Fenner, her excess an
emotional response to the fear of losing (or in Fenner's case the actual loss
of) someone she loves. This episode marks the first occasion when we see Fenner
demonstrate a true emotional response to something,
devastated at being left by his wife. Similarly, Nikki is deathly afraid of
losing Helen, and everything she reads into Helen's interactions with Claire and
Dominic is driven by this fear, and by her attachment to Helen.
There seems to be the slightest suggestion that emotion-driven excess is more
tolerable, or understandable, than both under-reaction, and excess driven by
self-interest, by a psychological pathology. Not only does Renee suffer the
worst fate of all these characters, but characters like Shaz and Sylvia, who
demonstrate a disturbing lack of feeling (Sylvia actually articulates a wish
that an inmate will die every day so the officers won't have to work as hard)
suffer as well. Sylvia, in particular, is punished severely (with a demotion)
for her incompetence in allowing Shaz and Denny to steal her keys. Fenner, on
the other hand, comes through unscathed, even after being drunk at work multiple
times. Karen responds to his emotional devastation, providing
support and comfort, and when it comes to his job performance, significant
tolerance. In this way Bad Girls suggests that the worst thing, the thing most
deserving of punishment, isn't murder: it's to not care.
This essay arose from an online discussion on the Nikki
and Helen board. Thanks to the following people who participated:
richard, Lisa289, invisicoll, badgirlnuts, ekny, Nikkhele,